Call Today
415-298-7284

Richtek Usa V Upi Semiconductor

Share on Social Media
Richtek USA v. UPI Semiconductor (2015) 242 Cal.App.4th 651.
The trial court was not entitled to take judicial notice of the hearsay facts alleged in a 2007 Taiwan complaint that contradicted the allegations in the 2011 amended complaint filed in the US, only that the complaint had been filed and the truth of any determination of the merits of the complaint.
In California State Bar cases, there are a number of rules and holdings devoted to depriving the accused attorney of successfully asserting hearsay objections. This fact is shocking to most attorneys who find themselves in State Bar Court.